Clarke and directed by Stanley Kubrick.
The picture that was sent back showed this flag fluttering as in a wind.
Some believers in the moon landing hoax feel that this was proof that this picture had been taken on earth and not the result of a moon landing.
The fact that the flag flutters in the wind when there is no wind on the moon could lend some degree of credibility to the belief that this was a hoax. However, experts, in an attempt to defend the landing against the moon landing hoax theory explained that a vacuum has no friction.
Hence the picture was taken with the flag waving is proof that the moon landing hoax theory is incorrect. Driving the Rover The pictures of the astronauts driving the Rover also proved to many that this was a moon landing hoax However, the projection of the speed of a film showing the astronauts driving in the moon proves that it really did happen.
There were no clouds of dust rinsing from the tires of the Rover because moon dust returns directly to the surface. Therefore it was not possible back in to have this type of controlled environment in which to display a moon landing hoax.
Several scientists of the seventies, and even modern scientists of today, believe the technology of the time period was not advanced enough for man to journey to space. In addition, they also believe several elements, including radiation belts, solar wind, and cosmic rays would have made such a trip impossible.
Kaysing and others, including Sibrel claim that, according to that a Rocketdyne company report from the late s, the chance of a successful landing on the Moon was calculated to be 0.
Kaysing claimed in particular that the F-1 rocket engine used in the first stage of the Saturn V was too unreliable: This was at the time when the F-1, a much larger engine, was under intensive development. My point is this: The development of the Atlas booster was similarly troubled, but records do not show the thirteen consecutive failures of the Atlas that Kaysing claims.
I received a call from a Margaret Hardin of Portland, Oregon. She said that she had met a hooker in Reno in who admitted to her that two NASA engineers told her the Moon trips were a hoax.
His position makes me feel angry. We spent a lot of time getting ready to go to the Moon. Sibrel claims that the Moon landings provided the US Government with a public distraction from the Vietnam War, with lunar activities stopping abruptly and planned missions canceled, around the same time that the U.
However, that assertion is not chronologically correct, because the cancellations of the later flights occurred during the budgeting process in andwhen the War was still raging; and the last mission flew in Decemberwhen the war was still a major ongoing conflict.
What is on the reel and on the label are completely different. I suspect an editor put the wrong label on the tape 33 years ago and no reporter ever had the motive to be as thorough as I.
They are doing multiple takes of a single shot of the mission, from which only about ten seconds was ever broadcast. Because I have uncovered the original unedited version, mistakenly not destroyed, the photography proves to be a clever forgery.Many people think of this as a moon landing hoax or the first man on the moon hoax.
In spite of all the evidence to the contrary, some people still believe that the landing of a man on the moon was a trick of television.
A Debunking of the Moon Hoax Theory Unlike Weidner’s essay, this next source was written in the form of a debate. The author, Robert A. Braeunig, believes that the moon landing is in fact real beyond doubts.
Moon Landing Hoax Essay Moon Landing Hoax At the end of the 60’s decade, the global society was shocked and surprised to witness one of monumental events in the history of humankind - Moon Landing Hoax Essay introduction. Essay Moon Landing Hoax NASA claims, the type of fuel that was used was a mixture of fuels to allow a transparent flame to be used (Millis).
On the other hand, there would have to be a visible flame coming off the landing module due to the gas being released into the atmosphere. Some believers in the moon landing hoax feel that this was proof that this picture had been taken on earth and not the result of a moon landing.
The fact that the flag flutters in the wind when there is no wind on the moon could lend some degree of credibility to the belief that this was a hoax.
The first book about the subject, Bill Kaysing’s self-published We Never Went to the Moon: America’s Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle, was released in , two years after the Apollo Moon flights had ended.